Monday, May 6, 2024
HomeVideoPHOTO: Alina Habba’s check paid $15K for both of Trump’s fines for...

PHOTO: Alina Habba’s check paid $15K for both of Trump’s fines for violating his gag order not to attack his clerk


Information reaching Kossyderrickent has it that Alina Habba’s check paid $15,000 for both of Trump’s fines for violating his gag order not to attack his clerk.


The ruling required Trump and his attorney, Alina Habba, to pay nearly $938,000 to the defendants in the case.

A spokesman for Trump and Habba did not immediately respond to requests for comment late Thursday.

Middlebrooks in September dismissed the suit Trump had filed against Clinton, former top FBI officials and the Democratic Party, rejecting the former president’s claims that they and others conspired to sink his winning presidential campaign by alleging ties to Russia.

Information reads: “Alina Habba’s check paying both of Trump’s fines for violating his gag order not to attack his clerk.”

Amid endless whining, Donald Trump’s lawyers have paid the $15,000.00 in fines for his violations of the gag order.

“Trump’s lawyers have complained endlessly about Judge Engoron, his clerk, the related gag order, and the two fines Trump has now accumulated through violations thereof. But Alina Habba’s firm has now paid them both on his behalf,” Lisa Ruben pointed out above this image. 

No matter how loudly Donald Trump whines on social media or the length of his endless griping about personal vendettas during “campaign” speeches, watch what he does. Watch what he does, not what he says.

He paid the fine. And this is how you know things are different this time. Donald Trump is being held accountable by someone, he can’t get out of it, his usual tricks aren’t working, and so he is left to pay the court fine like everyone else.

In a blistering filing, U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks accused Trump of a “pattern of abuse of the courts” for filing frivolous lawsuits for political purposes, which he said “undermines the rule of law” and “amounts to obstruction of justice.”

“Here, we are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose,” he wrote.

Citing Trump’s recent legal action against the Pulitzer Prize board, New York Attorney General Letitia James, big tech companies and CNN, he described Trump as “a prolific and sophisticated litigant” who uses the courts “to seek revenge on political adversaries.”

READ ALSO  CNN and BBC haven't confirmed report of Military coup in Republic of the Congo happening right now

WATCH VIDEO

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular

- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -