On August 2, 2023, the commander in chief of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), Julius Sello Malema, held a media briefing, marking the first public appearance since the ten-year anniversary celebration of the party. During the press conference, Malema revealed that some of his bank accounts had been closed by major financial institutions in South Africa.
The prominent political figure disclosed the concerning development, stating that both FNB (First National Bank) and ABSA (Amalgamated Banks of South Africa) had closed some of his accounts. Furthermore, he expressed frustration as his 17-year-old son’s bank account application was declined without any apparent justification, raising questions about the treatment of EFF members by financial institutions in the country.
Addressing the media, Malema asserted, “We’re being bullied by banks in South Africa,” suggesting that there might be an underlying agenda behind the account closures. He emphasized that his son, who has not engaged in any illegal activities, should not be subjected to such treatment.
Julius Malema’s situation drew attention to a broader trend, as he joins the ranks of other high-profile individuals like Duduzane Zuma, whose bank accounts were previously closed down. In such cases, banks often cite suspicions of money laundering as the reason behind the account closures. Deposits of exorbitant amounts without proper explanations have been noted as one of the possible triggers for such actions.
The closure of Malema’s accounts adds to the ongoing discourse around financial transparency and banking practices in South Africa. It raises concerns about the accountability of financial institutions and their protocols for handling suspicious transactions or activities.
Source : https://twitter.com/ThisIsColbert/status/1686760638641553408?t=gfr2PQLCjaT2m_g-99tpoA&s=19
Following Malema’s statement, there has been a mix of reactions from the public, political commentators, and financial experts. Some have shown solidarity with Malema, questioning the fairness of the banks’ actions and suggesting that more transparency is needed in the process of closing accounts.
On the other hand, supporters of the banks argue that they have a legal obligation to monitor and report suspicious activities to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. They contend that account closures are carried out based on well-established regulatory guidelines to safeguard the integrity of the banking system.
Source : https://twitter.com/ThisIsColbert/status/1686760638641553408?t=5t1ye3gdty0FayrIWsAW6A&s=19
The situation has sparked discussions on social media, with various opinions being shared in response to the news. Some users express concern over potential abuse of power by financial institutions, while others advocate for more stringent financial regulations to combat illicit financial activities.
As the controversy unfolds, public attention remains focused on the relationship between politicians and the banking sector in South Africa. Julius Malema’s case has underscored the need for transparent procedures and open dialogue to ensure that financial institutions act responsibly while upholding the rights of their customers.
Content created and supplied by: Bumex (via Opera
News )
